Presumption of residence and tax treatment: what implications?

18.1.2023
Read Time: 3'
Italian citizens who have been removed from the resident population registers and moved to a privileged tax country are also considered residents unless proven otherwise.
It is up to the taxpayer to provide contrary evidence to overcome the presumption of residence
Conflict of residence is resolved by splitting the tax period following the provisions of the OECD Model Convention against double taxation
The presumption of residence
As is well known, according to paragraph 2-bis of Article 2 of the Consolidated Income Tax Act, Italian citizens who have been removed from the registers of the resident population and transferred to states or territories with a privileged tax regime are also considered residents unless proven otherwise. The presumption of residency operates to prevent that by merely transferring residence to jurisdictions considered "tax havens," individuals evade taxation on income produced. Under Article 2 Tuir, in fact:- Individuals, both resident and nonresident in the territory of the State, are taxable persons
- For income tax, persons who, for the more significant part of the taxable period, are registered in the registers of the resident population or have in the territory of the State their domicile or residence under the Civil Code are considered residents.
- Italian citizens who have been erased from the registries of the resident population and transferred to states or territories other than those identified by Ministerial Decree 4.5.1999, published in G.U. 10.5.1999 No. 107, are also considered residents unless proven otherwise.